This paper examines how the riskiness of investment options offered in 529 college savings plan menus affects college attendance. I document large differences in the asset allocation of investment options related to the same investment strategy across asset management firms setting 529 plan menus. Exploiting these differences as a source of plausible exogenous variation, I find that a 1 percentage point (pp) higher average share of risky assets in investment options offered in in-state 529 plan menus increases the four-year college attendance of high school students with 529 accounts in a state by 2.5 pp (4.4%) over the period 2013-2021. Choosing from a 529 plan menu with riskier investment options, households end up with a riskier asset allocation in individual 529 accounts, which leads to a larger 529 account balance as a result of higher ex-post investment returns and increased contributions to 529 accounts following such returns. Over the sample period, the variation in the riskiness of investment options offered in 529 plan menus leads to between-state differences in the average 529 account balance of more than half the tuition costs of a four-year, in-state college degree. My results suggest that the design of 529 college savings plans has a substantial impact on human capital investments.

Using data from over 75,000 professors across fields and U.S. universities, we quantify a 50% wage premium for Finance research faculty. We document a positive correlation between students' future earnings and faculty pay across fields. In addition, within fields, faculty wage elasticity to students' lifetime earnings is three times higher in Finance than in other fields. Evidence suggests that higher student earnings lead to increased university revenues. Competition for talent and fairness considerations may explain why Finance professors obtain a fraction of these additional revenues, hence accounting for a pronounced wage spill-over from the industry to academia in Finance.

This paper empirically studies how college savings motives affect household stock market participation. More than 65% of households saving for college allocate at least a portion of their college savings to stocks, which are also the most popular class of risky assets for college savings investments. Employing the implementation of a financial aid program that eliminated college saving motives for some military households, I demonstrate that it reduced the probability of stock market participation outside of retirement accounts for these households by more than a quarter. I provide additional evidence that college savings motives explain a significant share of stock market participation by demonstrating that only one form of college savings, education savings accounts, accounts for 21% of stock market participation outside of retirement accounts for households with children.

This paper studies how menu design affects household participation and contributions in 529 college savings programs. Our empirical setting exploits two types of state-level staggered variation in program menu design: the inclusion of investment options tailored to different risk tolerance levels and the addition of an alternative menu through the creation of an additional 529 plan. We find that the inclusion of risk-based target-date options and the creation of an additional 529 plan both enhance participation and contributions in in-state college savings programs. The inclusion of static asset allocation options has no effect on participation but raises household contributions. Our results suggest that modifying the menu design of 529 college savings programs can increase investments in human capital.

Using the bill of lading data, this paper explores how information on international transportation activities is transmitted into stock prices and analyst forecasts depending on disclosure retirements and the availability of new image recognition technology.

This paper studies the effect of college tuition on household portfolio allocation and stock market participation. The results indicate that the negative effect of rising tuition on college attendance is partially offset by an increase in stock market participation, which leads to more accumulated college savings.